Southern Miss.
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
450  Rebecca Ulrich SR 20:50
786  Daphney Stanford JR 21:18
934  Kristin Zarrella JR 21:30
1,122  Dana Dillistone JR 21:44
1,442  Alondra Hoyos SO 22:05
2,046  Victoria Hoppe FR 22:45
2,554  Avery Rosenbalm SO 23:31
National Rank #156 of 339
South Region Rank #16 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 13th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 3.6%
Top 20 in Regional 98.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rebecca Ulrich Daphney Stanford Kristin Zarrella Dana Dillistone Alondra Hoyos Victoria Hoppe Avery Rosenbalm
Chile Pepper Festival 10/02 1197 21:04 21:13 21:57 21:46 22:08 23:09 23:31
Alabama Crimson Classic Invitational 10/16 1164 20:51 21:28 21:21 21:27 22:10 23:07 24:12
Conference USA Championships 10/31 1155 20:45 21:17 21:32 21:45 21:55 22:33 23:11
South Region Championships 11/13 1168 20:49 21:22 21:23 22:02 22:12 22:21 23:28





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 14.7 468 0.3 3.3 8.1 12.0 13.4 12.9 12.4 11.1 9.9 7.6 5.1 2.5 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rebecca Ulrich 0.0% 84.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rebecca Ulrich 48.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8
Daphney Stanford 80.6 0.0
Kristin Zarrella 92.7
Dana Dillistone 107.0
Alondra Hoyos 134.6
Victoria Hoppe 187.5
Avery Rosenbalm 226.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.3% 0.3 9
10 3.3% 3.3 10
11 8.1% 8.1 11
12 12.0% 12.0 12
13 13.4% 13.4 13
14 12.9% 12.9 14
15 12.4% 12.4 15
16 11.1% 11.1 16
17 9.9% 9.9 17
18 7.6% 7.6 18
19 5.1% 5.1 19
20 2.5% 2.5 20
21 0.9% 0.9 21
22 0.4% 0.4 22
23 0.2% 0.2 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0